The UN concept of World Habitat Day "is to reflect on the state of our towns and cities and the basic right to adequate shelter for all. It is also intended to remind the world of its collective responsibility for the future of the human habitat." The second part of that statement could be about fighting global warming. It could be about fighting trends in urban spatial development that make towns and cities less sustainable. Or it could be about fighting a battle in our own backyards.
In the July 21, 2008 edition of The New Yorker, Elizabeth Kolbert writes about the absurdities and forces that have given rise to the ubiquitous suburban lawn.
I recently spent a weekend in the rural South African town of Riebeek West, where there is some of the urban tendency to keep lawns trim and weed-free, but with much more tolerance for people who leave gardens untended for a while, or who grow indigenous plants instead of lawns. Here, it is much more obvious that to maintain a suburban-style lawn is to wage battle against nature. The summer is hot and dry, and water needs to be conserved.
But Kolbert writes that lawns are an invention that has spawned not only a multi-billion dollar complex of industries ("Americans spend an estimated forty billion dollars each year on grass."), but also a set of cultural forces that require conformity. The battle, in other words, is not only with the natural environment.
And here's why it's important to the future of the human habitat.