Most references to biodiversity are in relation to how we are reducing plant diversity by taking over habitats either by expanding the built environment or by extending agricultural areas. What is rarely considered is the role of humans as animals (technically 'megafauna') within the ecosystem. An article published in the August 12 edition of PNAS presents a fascinating argument about the risks of population collapse (ours and other megafauna) in the context of energy and climate change.
The creation of biomass, whether as plants or animals, depends on energy flow through ecosystems, and the source of that energy is the sun. Until the industrial revolution, humans relied on solar energy directly, just as other species do - then we extended our ability to grow as a population by drawing from stored energy sources: wood, coal, oil and natural gas. So our current population growth trajectory depends on finite energy reserves. People have written before about the limits to growth - notably the Club of Rome - and their estimates of the limits of earth's carrying capacity have been shown to be inaccurate. But this new analysis approaches the issue from a different angle: the trade-off of biomass among megafauna.