If the interest shown by architects is any indication of housing trends, then green architecture may be starting to move into the mainstream (in the US, at least). Delegates at the recent national convention of the American Institute of Architects talked about how affordable housing - yes, affordable housing - could incorporate features like reduced heat loss, reduced use of toxic materials, improved ventilation, low-flow plumbing fixtures, energy efficient appliances, recycled building materials and even green roofs.
There also seems to be increased recognition of the importance of improved connections in walkable communities. Traditional neighbourhood models are seen as unsustainable, but implementing strategies like increased residential densities to support public transport also require other changes to make neighbourhoods livable: things like a greater range of housing types, mixed-use areas and more active parks. Lining public squares with housing, and giving streets features that welcome pedestrians are seen as part of an approach to designing the public realm for safe, healthy, sustainable communities.
In Cape Town I know of two low-income sustainable housing developments being planned (in Philippi and Oude Moulen). As in the US, most such developments rely on some sort of handout to get off the drawing table, although the Kuyasa project in Khayelitsha shows promise for developing a financial model that is less dependent.
Meanwhile, the best corporate effort on office buildings in Cape Town consists of little more than sticking some PV panels on the roof of BP's headquarters, completed four or five years ago in the V&A Waterfront. It seems we can't yet escape the pattern of showing green credentials by adopting a few cutting-edge technologies. Time to move on. There is growing evidence that there are circumstances where building green can be profitable, but most corporates, architects and engineers don't yet realise this.